Practical Workflow Examples

Before and AfterAI Coding Prompts

Vibe Workflow is not a prompt dump. It turns a loose product idea into a chain of documents that an AI coding assistant can use: research questions, a PRD, a technical design, and project-specific agent instructions. These examples show what changes at each stage.

The vague version

"Build me a meal planning app" sounds clear to a human, but it leaves the model guessing about the user, business model, data model, platform, privacy expectations, and what counts as a successful first version. The result is usually broad, generic code with fragile scope.

The workflow version

Vibe Workflow asks for the missing context first. The same idea becomes a constrained build brief for busy families, with launch scope, measurable outcomes, storage choices, and agent rules that keep implementation focused.

Four Stages of Better Context

Each stage produces a different artifact. The goal is not longer prompts for their own sake; the goal is to remove ambiguity before an AI tool starts writing files.

Research

Too thin

Research competitors for a recipe app.

Build-ready

Research recipe apps for busy families who plan weekly meals, compare onboarding, pantry tracking, shopping list flows, pricing, and the technical risk of barcode scanning.

What the artifact should clarify
  • Market map with direct and indirect competitors
  • Adoption risks for first-time meal planners
  • Feature scope split between launch and later versions

PRD

Too thin

Write a PRD for the app.

Build-ready

Write a launch PRD for a family meal planner where the first successful user action is generating a weekly plan and exporting a grocery list in under five minutes.

What the artifact should clarify
  • Primary user journey and acceptance criteria
  • MVP feature list with explicit non-goals
  • Success metrics that can be checked after launch

Technical Design

Too thin

Choose a stack and build plan.

Build-ready

Design a Vite React + Supabase MVP with recipe search, saved meal plans, household members, grocery list export, and a simple path to mobile later.

What the artifact should clarify
  • Database tables and row ownership rules
  • API boundaries and client state responsibilities
  • Implementation phases that an AI coding agent can follow

Agent Setup

Too thin

Make Cursor rules.

Build-ready

Generate AGENTS.md and Cursor rules that preserve the MVP scope, require accessibility checks for forms, and keep recipe imports behind a service abstraction.

What the artifact should clarify
  • Project-specific build constraints
  • File ownership and coding standards
  • Review checklist for AI-generated changes

Quality Rules Used by the Workflow

These are the checks behind the templates. They are also useful when reviewing any AI-generated PRD or AGENTS.md file before handing it to a coding assistant.

Name the user and the first useful outcome

A prompt improves immediately when it says who the product is for and what result proves the product is useful.

Separate launch scope from later ambition

AI agents overbuild when the prompt mixes MVP features, future ideas, and nice-to-have polish into one undifferentiated list.

Give constraints before implementation starts

Budget, platform, auth, storage, accessibility, privacy, and deployment constraints belong in the planning documents, not as corrections after code exists.

Turn taste into checkable criteria

Instead of saying "make it premium", specify layout density, interaction expectations, empty states, and what a reviewer should reject.

Use the Examples with the Live Builder

Start with your own app idea, choose the persona closest to you, and compare the generated research prompt, PRD prompt, technical design prompt, and AGENTS.md output against the quality rules above.